Border Crisis: Thailand and Cambodia on the Brink of War
An overview of the explosive conflict between Thailand and Cambodia in July 2025: historical roots, recent escalation, disputed border zones, and the stakes surrounding temples like Preah Vihear. Demander à ChatGPT
BLOG GÉNÉRAL
7/27/202524 min read
This page will be updated regularly.
🇹🇭🇰🇭 Border Crisis: Thailand and Cambodia on the Brink of War
📰 Press Briefing –
October 1, 2025 – Today
The July ceasefire remains largely respected.
Thai Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul is multiplying signals of appeasement ahead of the ASEAN summit.
Phnom Penh is nevertheless calling for a neutral monitoring mechanism, with international observers, to verify the reduction of Thai troops.
Border populations are still living in uncertainty: mined areas, movement restrictions, slow humanitarian aid.
🎯 Expectations of Thailand (new Anutin government)
Internal stability above all
After the dismissal of Paetongtarn Shinawatra, Anutin wants to show strong leadership and turn the page on the scandal.
Border management serves to strengthen his political legitimacy.
Revision of border agreements
Bangkok considers some old agreements (dating back to the French colonial era) to be disadvantageous.
Hence the idea of a national referendum to consult the population on a possible renegotiation.
Reduction of costly military presence
The Thai army has been massively mobilized since July.
Anutin wants to reduce expenses and show the international community a willingness to de-escalate.
Restoring regional image
Thailand wants to appear as a responsible and peaceful actor ahead of the ASEAN summit.
It also hopes to reassure its economic partners (Singapore, Vietnam, Japan).
🎯 Expectations of Cambodia (Hun Manet government, with Hun Sen highly influential)
Guarantee of ceasefire compliance
Phnom Penh wants to avoid any return to the fighting of July.
Cambodia is demanding the establishment of international observers to monitor the border.
Preservation of existing agreements
For Phnom Penh, the current border agreements are a clear legal basis, validated by history and sometimes by international arbitration.
A unilateral Thai withdrawal would be seen as a provocation.
Recognition of Cambodian sovereignty
Cambodia insists on the recognition of its rights in disputed areas (Emerald Triangle, mining zones).
It wants to prevent Bangkok from imposing a new demarcation by force or political pressure.
Humanitarian aid and demining
Hundreds of thousands of civilians have been displaced. Phnom Penh expects humanitarian cooperation from Thailand and its regional partners.
Cambodia is pushing for joint demining projects to secure border areas.
🔑 In summary
Thailand: show political strength, revise agreements deemed unfair, reduce military costs, regain international prestige.
Cambodia: secure the ceasefire, maintain existing agreements, guarantee sovereignty, obtain aid for civilians and demining.
📝 Conclusion – Situation as of October 1, 2025
The border crisis between Thailand and Cambodia is entering a phase of fragile de-escalation.
In Bangkok, new Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul is trying to ease tensions by displaying his willingness for reform and dialogue, while seeking to reinforce his political legitimacy.
In Phnom Penh, the government remains cautious: it demands concrete guarantees, such as the presence of international observers and respect for existing border agreements.
The ceasefire signed in July still holds, but border areas remain unstable: military presence, mined villages, displaced populations.
The upcoming ASEAN summit will be a decisive test: either it paves the way for lasting appeasement, or it reveals the depth of mistrust between the two neighbors.
🌱 Signs of hope
Despite lingering mistrust, some elements point to a possible way out of the crisis:
Thailand has committed to reducing troops and heavy weapons.
Both countries are discussing joint demining projects and cross-border cooperation.
International financial support for demining NGOs and displaced civilians opens the way for humanitarian improvement.
As of October 1, 2025, peace is thus suspended in a precarious balance, but the first gestures of confidence show that a path toward reconciliation remains possible.
Late September 2025
Foreign funding begins to support demining NGOs in areas affected by the fighting.
Displaced civilians start returning gradually, but the humanitarian situation remains precarious (destroyed villages, lack of infrastructure).
A few minor incidents are reported between patrols, without resumption of major clashes.
September 26, 2025
Bangkok announces the preparation of a national referendum on the revision or withdrawal of border agreements with Cambodia.
Mixed reactions:
Thailand sees it as a way to legitimize its diplomatic choices.
Cambodia fears a return to confrontation if Thailand frees itself from existing agreements.
September 25, 2025
The Thai Foreign Minister calls to:
reduce troops at the border,
withdraw heavy weapons,
cooperate with Phnom Penh on joint demining projects and the fight against trafficking.
Early September 2025
Several border posts remain closed for security reasons.
Technical discussions between the militaries of both countries resume under ASEAN mediation (Malaysia, Indonesia).
Situation relatively calm despite some localized tensions in the Emerald Triangle.
August 29, 2025
The Thai Constitutional Court confirms the dismissal of Paetongtarn Shinawatra, implicated in the recording scandal with Hun Sen.
Anutin Charnvirakul becomes Prime Minister.
He announces a roadmap: political stability, reform of border agreements, and military de-escalation with Cambodia.
👉 Conclusion:
Since August, the situation has shifted from a political crisis in Thailand to a phase of cautious de-escalation. The new government wants to demonstrate its willingness for dialogue, but Phnom Penh’s mistrust and the humanitarian scars still weigh heavily.
Date: August 23, 2025
📌 Thailand–Cambodia Conflict: Situation Update
Press Update – Last 72 Hours on the Thailand–Cambodia Conflict (August 20-23, 2025)
Border Tensions Between Thailand and Cambodia: Three Days of Diplomatic Friction and Regional Mediation
Bangkok – Phnom Penh, August 23, 2025
The past 72 hours have been marked by intensifying political debates in Thailand, deep economic concerns following the mass departure of Cambodian workers, and a sustained diplomatic effort from Cambodia to consolidate a still fragile ceasefire.
1. Testimony of the Suspended Thai Prime Minister
On August 21, 2025, Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, currently suspended by the Constitutional Court, delivered highly anticipated testimony. She was questioned about a controversial phone call with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen, leaked in June.
In that exchange, she referred to him as “uncle” and appeared to disparage a Thai general. When Hun Sen released the recording, it triggered a major political crisis in Bangkok.
Paetongtarn defended her words, claiming they were part of a negotiation strategy. Critics, however, argue that her remarks undermined Thailand’s position internationally. The incident highlights how domestic political struggles in Thailand are spilling over into bilateral diplomacy.
Sources: AP News, Wikipedia, The Guardian
2. Pressure on Thailand’s Labor Market
Since the border conflict flared up in late July, nearly 400,000 Cambodian workers have left Thailand to return home. This labor exodus has hit key sectors hard, including agriculture, construction, and manufacturing.
In response, the Thai government approved the recruitment of 10,000 Sri Lankan workers and is considering bringing in additional workers from Nepal, Bangladesh, Indonesia, and the Philippines.
Sources: Reuters, PBS, Wikipedia
3. Military Situation and Diplomacy: A Fragile Ceasefire
On the ground, the truce declared on July 28, 2025, remains formally in effect. However, warning signs are mounting: troop build-ups on both sides of the border, tense diplomatic exchanges, and constant fears of renewed clashes.
In Kuala Lumpur, a fresh round of talks has opened under the mediation of Malaysia, the United States, and China, aimed at preserving the fragile stability. For now, the situation is frozen, but the risk of escalation looms large.
Sources: Al Jazeera, Reuters, Wikipedia
4. Cambodia’s Position: Diplomacy at the Forefront
4.1 Reinforced Ceasefire Monitoring via ASEAN
At the General Border Committee meeting in Kuala Lumpur, both countries agreed to deploy ASEAN monitoring teams on their respective sides of the border, coordinated by Malaysia. However, these observers will not cross into each other’s territory.
One sticking point remains: the fate of 18 Cambodian soldiers captured by Thailand. Phnom Penh demands their release, while Bangkok insists their detention is “legal,” with Red Cross access guaranteed.
Sources: Khmer Times, Reuters, AP News, Wikipedia
4.2 Official Condemnations
Cambodian authorities have repeatedly denounced Thai military maneuvers, calling them violations of the ceasefire. Phnom Penh has urged the international community to pressure Bangkok and to prioritize legal and technical solutions over military force.
Source: Wikipedia
4.3 Legal and Diplomatic Approach
Cambodia’s Ministry of Defense continues to stress a legal settlement of the border dispute. Officials emphasize international law as the only path to lasting peace and regional stability.
Sources: ABC News, Reddit, Wikipedia
4.4 No Major Incidents in the Past 72 Hours
No direct clashes have been reported recently. Cambodia’s focus appears to remain on regional diplomacy and ASEAN-led ceasefire monitoring, rather than military escalation.
Conclusion
As of August 23, 2025, relations between Thailand and Cambodia remain tense but contained. In Bangkok, political turmoil is weakening the country’s diplomatic coherence, while the economy suffers from the massive loss of Cambodian labor. In Phnom Penh, the government is doubling down on regional diplomacy and international law, but refuses to back down over the issue of captured soldiers.
The ceasefire is still holding — but remains fragile, hanging on the success of negotiations in Kuala Lumpur and the ability of both governments to resist sliding back into armed confrontation.
Date: August 20, 2025
1. Diplomatic Dialogue and Enhanced Monitoring
August 20: Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, as ASEAN chair, held separate phone calls with Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thailand’s acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai. Talks focused on the progress of the ceasefire implementation and on strengthening monitoring operations carried out by the Interim Observer Team (IOT). The goal is to improve effectiveness along the border and prepare for the upcoming meeting of the General Border Committee (GBC). (thevibes.com)
Cambodia confirmed that the security situation remains stable in border provinces such as Preah Vihear, Oddar Meanchey, and Banteay Meanchey, with strong control maintained by local forces.
2. Humanitarian Crisis and Labor Shortages
August 19: Thailand authorized the recruitment of 10,000 Sri Lankan workers to offset a labor shortage caused by the mass return of Cambodian workers. The conflict has led around 400,000 Cambodians—roughly 12% of Thailand’s foreign workforce—to return to their home country, worsening the labor market situation. The Thai government is also considering workers from Nepal, Bangladesh, Indonesia, and the Philippines. (reuters.com)
Date: August 15, 2025
Border Situation
The situation remains highly tense along the disputed border between the two countries, particularly in the Surin province (Thailand) and Oddar Meanchey province (Cambodia), where several historic temples are at the center of sovereignty disputes.
Events and Mutual Accusations
Although a ceasefire was extended in early August, sporadic clashes continue. Each side accuses the other of violating the agreement by increasing patrols, strengthening military positions, and conducting drone flights and provocations.
Phnom Penh has accused a senior Thai commander of publicly announcing a plan to "seize" the Ta Krabey temple and close access to the Ta Moan Thom site on the Cambodian side.
Bangkok, in turn, accuses Cambodia of escalating tensions by deploying additional troops and using drones to locate Thai positions. Thailand claims it is ready to regain control of certain strategic sites, asserting they "belong" to the nation and mentioning military preparations.
Humanitarian, Diplomatic, and Military Situation
Both armies remain on high alert despite the official freeze on movements and patrols near the border. The tension is palpable, with forces positioned just meters apart around the disputed temples.
Local authorities are calling for calm, but there have been no major armed exchanges in the past 48 hours—only verbal skirmishes and observed troop and equipment movements on both sides.
International observers and bilateral dialogue mechanisms are in place to prevent a resumption of fighting. Each country highlights its cooperation efforts while publicly accusing the other through the media.
Outlook
A high-level defense ministry meeting is planned for early September, aiming to rebuild trust and reduce the risk of escalation.
Civilians near the border remain concerned, with many having fled the area during the July clashes.
Summary:
The last 48 hours have seen a fragile status quo: no major armed clashes, but continued high tension, reinforced military postures, and nationalist rhetoric from both sides. The risk of renewed hostilities remains if the situation is not stabilized soon.
📰 Press Briefing –
Date: August 13, 2025
Local context: relative calm and defensive posture
The Thai forces report that there have been no new clashes between the evening of August 12 and the morning of August 13. They maintain 11 strategic positions along the border, ready to respond to any violation of sovereignty (Nation Thailand).
Human and social consequences
Hundreds of thousands of Cambodian migrant workers in Thailand are returning home in an attempt to escape instability. This situation creates significant economic uncertainty for these families (AP News, The Standard).
In addition, the detention of 18 Cambodian soldiers in Thailand since the ceasefire remains a major diplomatic concern, sparking legal and political debates (CambodgeMag).
Finally, Cambodian opposition leader Sam Rainsy is exploiting the conflict to rally his supporters, promoting a nationalist and activist agenda against the government of Hun Manet (Nation Thailand, Time).
Date: August 12, 2025
1. Thai Soldier Seriously Injured by Landmine
A Thai paramilitary ranger was severely injured and had a leg amputated after stepping on a landmine on Tuesday, August 12, 2025.
The incident occurred during a patrol near Ta Muen Thom Temple in Surin Province, about one kilometer from the Cambodian border, in a disputed area claimed by both countries.
According to Thai authorities, this is the fourth such accident in recent weeks despite the ceasefire currently in place. The event has reignited fears of possible truce violations.
2. Mass Return of Cambodian Migrant Workers
Border tensions have triggered a massive movement of people: hundreds of thousands of Cambodian migrant workers living and working in Thailand are returning home.
Key reasons include:
Fear of renewed clashes
Security concerns in certain border areas
Economic difficulties caused by the instability
This exodus continues despite the Malaysia-brokered ceasefire implemented in late July.
3. ASEAN Observers Deployed, but Deep Mistrust Remains
In efforts to stabilize the border, Cambodia and Thailand have agreed to the deployment of ASEAN observers to monitor compliance with the ceasefire.
However, regional diplomats note that deep mistrust remains between the two sides:
Mutual accusations of provocations persist
Landmine incidents complicate observers’ missions
Military presence remains high in some contested zones
4. A Fragile Ceasefire
The ceasefire, in effect since July 28, 2025, is officially holding, but recent incidents — particularly Tuesday’s landmine explosion — highlight its fragility.
Main points of contention include:
Poorly demarcated border areas
Reinforced military presence on both sides
Disputes over the return of captured personnel
August 11, 2025
International inspections on the border
Inspections are underway on the Thai side to highlight sites allegedly bombed by Cambodia (schools, medical facilities). These visits signal an escalation in tensions despite the current ceasefire (lepetitjournal.com).
Landmine explosions: new casualties
Three Thai soldiers were injured in a landmine explosion in Sisaket province, near the Cambodian border. The Thai army accuses Cambodia of planting new mines in violation of the Ottawa Convention; Phnom Penh denies this and says it is actively pursuing demining operations (apnews.com).
ASEAN monitoring of the ceasefire
Thailand and Cambodia have agreed to the deployment of ASEAN observers to monitor the fragile ceasefire concluded in mid-July. Teams will be stationed in each country—without crossing the border—within a dialogue framework led by Malaysia (reuters.com).
A surprising bid for the Nobel Peace Prize
Cambodia is considering nominating Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, in recognition of his role in mediating the ceasefire. The move is seen as a strategic diplomatic gesture aimed at diversifying Phnom Penh’s international alliances (filipinotimes.net).
Summary
Tensions remain high along the border: military incidents, mutual accusations, and a politically charged atmosphere despite stabilization efforts. The active involvement of ASEAN and the international community is more crucial than ever to consolidate these efforts and prevent further escalation.
August 9, 2025
New Landmine Explosion and Accusations
Three Thai soldiers were seriously injured by an anti-personnel mine near the Cambodian border. One of them lost a foot (Wikipedia + AP News).
The Thai army accuses Cambodia of laying new mines, which would constitute a violation of the Ottawa Treaty. Cambodia denies any involvement, emphasizing its internationally recognized commitment to demining (Wikipedia).
This is the third mine-related incident in less than a month, further undermining the current truce (AP News).
📍 Location and Context
The explosion occurred near the border between Sa Kaeo Province (Thailand) and northwestern Cambodia, in an area already known for its military tensions and minefields dating back to past conflicts.
It is a wooded, hard-to-reach area where border patrols are frequent.
💥 The Incident
Three Thai soldiers on patrol triggered an anti-personnel mine.
Casualties:
One soldier lost a foot.
Two others sustained severe injuries to their legs and torso.
The blast was powerful enough to destroy the radio equipment and damage the crew-served weapon they were carrying.
⚠️ Accusations and Reactions
Thailand: Claims the mine is newly planted and accuses Cambodia of laying it after the ceasefire, which would violate both the military agreement and the Ottawa Treaty (which bans anti-personnel mines).
Cambodia: Strongly denies the allegations, recalling that it has been recognized by the UN for its demining efforts since the 1990s and has no interest in re-mining the area.
ASEAN: Expressed concern because this incident occurred less than a week after the announcement of sending observers, weakening their mission before it even begins.
💡 What is particularly worrying is that the area where the mine exploded was considered partially secured. This means either that old, undetected mines remained, or that someone has indeed re-mined the sector recently.
August 7, 2025 – Ceasefire Agreements and Deployment of ASEAN Observers
At a meeting in Kuala Lumpur, the defense ministers of both countries agreed to deploy interim ASEAN observer teams, led by Malaysia, to monitor the ceasefire in place since late July (Council on Foreign Relations + AP News + The Times of India).
The ceasefire, the result of negotiations under diplomatic pressure — notably from U.S. President Donald Trump — includes commitments to freeze troop movements, avoid provocations, and enhance civilian safety (AP News).
Another meeting between the parties is already scheduled to continue the dialogue and build military confidence (France 24 + Wikipedia + Radio France Internationale).
🕊️ Current Situation & Diplomacy
Border tensions remain high, despite an informal ceasefire. Negotiations held in Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) concluded yesterday with a secretary-level agreement, but no final resolution has been signed yet (source: Al Jazeera).
Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim stated that the border dispute is “close to a resolution” during the ongoing meetings of the General Border Committee (source: Business Today Malaysia).
🚨 Humanitarian Impact
Thousands of civilians have fled the conflict areas. The Wat Po 5000 temple in Cambodia’s Preah Vihear Province has become the largest shelter for displaced people (source: Khmer Times).
The Seventh-day Adventist Church and other NGOs are providing food, medical care, and psychological support to affected families on both sides of the border.
Thailand’s Ministry of Public Health estimates over 146 million baht (~USD 4 million) in damage, mostly at Phanom Dong Rak Hospital, and plans to pursue legal action against those responsible (source: Nation Thailand).
📉 Economic Consequences
Thailand’s tourism sector is suffering severe losses, with estimated monthly losses of 3 billion baht (~USD 92 million).
More than 5,000 hotel bookings have been canceled, and several major tourist sites near the border are now closed (source: Khaosod English).
📝 Summary
The conflict remains militarily frozen but diplomatically unstable.
Thousands of civilians have been displaced, with temporary shelters providing basic aid.
Economic losses continue to grow, particularly in Thailand’s tourism industry.
🇰🇭 Cambodia’s Perspective: Border Conflict with Thailand – Press Briefing (August 7, 2025)
🕊️ Diplomatic Stance & Official Messaging
The Cambodian government continues to support diplomatic dialogue, participating in recent negotiations in Kuala Lumpur as part of the General Border Committee (GBC).
Cambodian representatives have expressed cautious optimism, awaiting a formal ceasefire agreement while continuing to monitor Thai military movements along disputed areas.
Phnom Penh has urged the international community, including ASEAN partners, to support mediation efforts and help prevent further escalation.
⚠️ Military and Security Conditions
Cambodian military units remain on alert along the northern border.
While no major engagements were reported in the last 24 hours, localized tension and patrol stand-offs continue in several forested border zones.Defense Ministry sources reaffirm Cambodia's intention to avoid escalation, but condemn Thai incursions into disputed buffer areas.
📉 Local Economic Disruptions
Border trade routes, especially in Oddar Meanchey and Banteay Meanchey, have seen significant slowdowns, affecting farmers and small-scale vendors.
Cambodian tourism officials report a sharp drop in regional travel, particularly near Anlong Veng and Preah Vihear, with hotel bookings down and tour operations suspended.
🗣️ Statements from Cambodian Officials
A government spokesperson stated:
“Cambodia remains committed to a peaceful solution. We will not tolerate armed provocations but continue to engage in good faith dialogue through ASEAN channels.”
Local governors in border provinces have called for urgent reinforcement of humanitarian aid and international monitoring of the situation.
📝 Summary
Cambodia maintains a defensive posture, supporting peace talks while condemning any border violations.
Humanitarian needs are rising, especially in northern provinces, with thousands displaced.
Economic pressure is mounting, particularly in border trade and tourism zones.
The situation remains tense, but no large-scale fighting has been reported in the past 24 hours.
🗓️ Report as of August 06, 2025
Thailand-Cambodia Tensions: 48 Hours of Stalemate as Crucial Talks Loom Tomorrow
Kuala Lumpur, August 6, 2025 — While the fragile ceasefire established on July 28 between Thailand and Cambodia technically remains in place, the last 48 hours have brought no tangible progress, either diplomatically or militarily. Though the fighting has stopped, mutual distrust continues to fuel a tense stalemate.
Since August 4, delegations from both countries have been meeting in Kuala Lumpur under the mediation of ASEAN, the United States, and China, in preparation for the General Border Committee (GBC) ministerial session scheduled for tomorrow. So far, however, no formal agreement has been reached.
Two Irreconcilable Visions
Cambodia’s priorities are:
The immediate release of the 18 Cambodian soldiers captured by Thai forces during the July clashes.
The removal of Thai military installations in the disputed border areas, particularly recently installed barbed wire fences.
An implicit recognition of the historical demarcation lines, which Phnom Penh claims have been violated by Bangkok.
Thailand, on the other hand, demands:
The official acknowledgment of Cambodia’s “temporary” territorial losses, pending future bilateral negotiations.
The continued detention of the Cambodian prisoners until full cessation of provocations is guaranteed.
International guarantees limiting Cambodian military activities in the contested areas.
High-Stakes Negotiations Under International Pressure
Tomorrow’s ministerial session is expected to be decisive. Discussions are set to focus on:
Establishing demilitarized buffer zones.
Implementing international monitoring mechanisms, likely through neutral ASEAN observers.
Drafting a roadmap for the release of prisoners.
Reopening bilateral dialogue on long-standing territorial disputes, a subject intentionally excluded from the current talks.
Regional powers, especially China and the United States, are intensifying pressure to prevent a renewed outbreak of violence, citing humanitarian concerns and the risk of broader regional destabilization.
A Dangerous Stalemate
For now, the situation remains frozen:
Troops on both sides are maintaining their positions.
Official dialogue is limited to technical discussions on ceasefire compliance.
On the ground, displaced civilians are starting to return to certain tense zones despite the absence of long-term security guarantees.
Expectations are high for tomorrow’s ministerial meeting. Should no compromise be found, the region risks spiraling back into military escalation.
🗞️ Recent Events
August 05, 2025
1. Continuation of Diplomatic Talks
Thai and Cambodian officials met today in Kuala Lumpur under the aegis of ASEAN (with Malaysia holding the rotating presidency) for a first session of the General Border Committee, aimed at consolidating the ceasefire declared on July 28, 2025.
A higher-level ministerial meeting is scheduled for this Thursday, with observers from the United States, China, and Malaysia expected to attend.
2. Ongoing Accusations and Violations
The ceasefire remains fragile: Thailand accuses Cambodia of violating the truce by installing barbed wire and devices in disputed areas.
In response, Cambodia rejects these accusations while vowing not to back down.
3. Reintegration of Former Cambodian Leaders
King Norodom Sihamoni has issued an exceptional decree allowing former Prime Minister Hun Sen to assist his son, Hun Manet, on military matters. Hun Sen plays an active role on social media to counter international criticism.
4. Drone Fears and Heightened Surveillance
In Thailand, the military is on high alert due to unidentified drones flying over the country—suspected of being linked to Cambodia or local groups. Authorities have urged the public to report any suspicious sightings while deploying anti-drone systems around strategic infrastructure.
5. Rumors of Impending Attacks
According to Cambodia’s Ministry of Defense, relayed via Telegram, Thailand is preparing new attacks from the Surin province. An evacuation alert has been issued for civilians in the area, with hostilities said to be “imminent.”
6. Climate of Societal Mistrust
Despite the official cessation of hostilities, online xenophobia and disinformation campaigns continue to fuel growing hostility. Cambodian workers in Thailand report facing discrimination, and millions have been affected by the closure of border crossings.
Summary:
Negotiations continue in Kuala Lumpur to establish peace terms.
Cross-accusations persist despite the formal truce.
Thailand has increased surveillance in response to suspicious activities.
The atmosphere remains tense, with threats of military escalation and a deteriorating social environment.
Regional Implications
1. Weakening of ASEAN’s Image as a Crisis Manager
The conflict exposes ASEAN’s limitations in mediating disputes between its members: despite the July 28, 2025 ceasefire negotiated in Kuala Lumpur, regional institutions struggle to enforce rigorous monitoring and defuse underlying tensions.
The agreement largely depends on Malaysia's leadership, but xenophobia and accusations against the mediators undermine the credibility of the process.
2. Increased Role of External Powers
The United States, through former President Donald Trump, played a key role by threatening trade sanctions, forcing both countries to negotiate.
China positioned itself as a secondary mediator via a meeting organized in Shanghai, reinforcing its role as a stabilizing power in Southeast Asia.
3. Surge of Internal Nationalism and Political Impact
The conflict highlights the rise of political nationalism in both countries: Hun Sen, former Cambodian Prime Minister, remains influential despite handing power to his son, Hun Manet, using nationalist rhetoric.
In Thailand, the tensions deepen a governance crisis within a weakened coalition, putting its stability to the test.
4. Economic Risk and Disruption of Regional Supply Chains
The imposition of martial law in several Thai border districts increases logistical constraints and raises costs for companies operating in or through these areas.
The closure of border crossings affects bilateral and regional trade flows, threatening long-term investor confidence.
5. A Critical Moment for Regional Stability
This escalation marks the most serious conflict between ASEAN members in decades, challenging regional peace efforts and shifting towards bilateral diplomacy under external influence.
The active role now played by non-ASEAN actors (United States, China) could create a new paradigm for handling regional disputes, moving away from traditional principles of non-interventionism.
🇹🇭 Thailand
Avoid all border regions with Cambodia, especially in the northeast.
Stay informed via local news and embassy alerts.
Follow all safety instructions issued by local authorities and embassies.
Do not attempt to cross disputed land borders.
🇰🇭 Cambodia
Do not travel to areas near the Preah Vihear temple or other disputed border provinces.
Avoid taking informal or secondary routes into Thailand.
Remain within major tourist zones unaffected by the conflict.
📌 General Recommendations for Both Countries
Avoid all border areas between Thailand and Cambodia, especially historically tense zones like Preah Vihear, Ta Muen Thom, and Ta Krabey.
Do not attempt land crossings through unofficial or closed checkpoints.
Stick to recognized tourist destinations: Bangkok, Chiang Mai, Siem Reap, Phnom Penh, the islands...
Be especially cautious in remote rural areas, where landmines may still be present.
If in doubt, contact your embassy or local consulate.
All essential information (hospitals, embassies, emergency contacts) is available in the "Practical Info" guide on the blog.
🔴 Tourist Risks in the Conflict Zone
Risk Level & Guidance
Travel to the Cambodia–Thailand border regions affected by armed conflict is strongly discouraged. Movement is dangerous within a wide perimeter along the border. Roads, temples, and villages in these areas are especially at risk, including some otherwise well-known historical sites.
Most land border crossings are closed or operating unpredictably. Air travel is currently the safest way to enter or exit Cambodia.
Tourists already in the region should immediately leave the conflict zone and notify their embassy or consulate.
Dangers for Travelers
Direct risk from fighting (artillery, explosions, increased military presence, landmines).
Sudden closure of roads and checkpoints, with no guarantee of emergency evacuation.
Risk of landmines around former conflict areas and historical zones.
Limited medical care in some regions due to insecurity and overwhelmed local hospitals.
✅ Practical Advice
Absolutely avoid all border areas and consult embassy advisories before any regional travel.
To leave the region, prioritize international flights—land routes remain unsafe.
Register with your embassy if stuck in the area and strictly follow all safety instructions.
Major urban centers like Phnom Penh and Siem Reap are not directly affected, but remain cautious, especially at night or in rural surroundings.
❓ FAQ: Cambodia–Thailand Conflict and Travel Tips
1. What is the current situation between Cambodia and Thailand?
Military forces on both sides have been engaged in intense fighting, with artillery shelling, rocket fire, and ground battles along the shared border. The violence has caused casualties and mass displacement.
2. How many people are affected?
Dozens have been killed or wounded, and over 100,000 civilians have been displaced from the border regions.
3. Which areas are most dangerous?
Avoid Preah Vihear, Ta Moan Thom, Ta Krabey, and surrounding villages and routes near the frontier.
4. Can tourists visit nearby attractions?
No. All visits near the conflict zones are strongly discouraged due to combat and the risk of landmines. Stay away until further notice.
5. Are the land borders between Thailand and Cambodia open?
Most are closed or open only sporadically. Use air travel to move in and out of Cambodia for now.
6. What should a tourist do if already in the conflict zone?
Leave immediately and report to your embassy or consulate. Follow all local security instructions.
7. What are the main dangers for tourists?
Combat-related threats (gunfire, shelling), landmine risk, sudden road closures, and limited medical access.
8. Are major Cambodian cities affected?
Phnom Penh and Siem Reap are not directly impacted, but caution is still advised, especially after dark or outside urban areas.
9. How can I follow updates on the situation?
Check embassy notices, international media, and local government announcements daily.
10. What precautions should I take before traveling to the region?
Avoid border zones, prefer air travel, have comprehensive travel insurance, and maintain contact with your embassy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
🌍 Origins of the Conflict
The conflict between Cambodia and Thailand stems from a border dispute dating back over a century, originating from the frontier line established by the French colonial power in the early 20th century. Thailand has long contested this demarcation. The most contentious areas involve the Preah Vihear temple (Cambodian side) and several other temples along the Dângrêk Mountains, located on the northwestern Cambodian and northeastern Thai borders.
In 1962, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) awarded sovereignty over Preah Vihear to Cambodia. However, the precise border demarcation and control of the lands surrounding the temple remain disputed, regularly reigniting tensions between the two neighbors.
🔥 Why Did the Conflict Escalate in July 2025?
In May 2025, the death of a Cambodian soldier during a skirmish and injuries sustained by Thai soldiers due to landmine explosions reignited the conflict.
Both countries accuse each other of territorial violations.
A wave of nationalism fueled by competition over heritage temples — including Preah Vihear, Prasat Ta Muen Thom, and Ta Krabey — is also being used to distract attention from internal political crises in both nations.
On July 24, 2025, the military escalation reached a level unseen since 2011, with ground combat, artillery shelling, aerial bombardments, and the use of BM-21 rocket systems. Nearly 150,000 civilians were forced to flee their homes.
🗺️ Names and Areas of the Disputed Border
🇹🇭 On the Thai side:
Province of Surin
Province of Sisaket (including Kantharalak District)
Province of Buriram
Region of the Dângrêk Mountains
🇰🇭 On the Cambodian side:
Province of Oddar Meanchey
Province of Preah Vihear
The fiercest clashes take place near the temples of Preah Vihear, Ta Muen Thom, and Ta Krabey, in what is often termed the “Emerald Triangle” — the tri-border area of Cambodia, Thailand, and Laos.
🌐 Geopolitical Dimension within Southeast Asia
This conflict is set against the backdrop of broader Southeast Asian tensions rooted in colonial-era border divisions. The contested frontier area is rich in rice fields and Khmer cultural heritage and is home to diverse Lao, Vietnamese, and Khmer populations, adding ethnic and political complexity.
Located not far from regional metropolises like Hanoi (Vietnam) and Hong Kong (China), this territory remains a strategic crossroads of multiple Asian influences. The conflict is disrupting tourist circuits in Laos and Cambodia, historically popular during the summer monsoon season, including Mekong cruises.
The situation also raises broader security concerns, particularly around visas and passports for foreign travelers, as well as border closures that now make air travel essential for entering or exiting Cambodia.
🛑 Impact on Religious and Cultural Tourism in Southeast Asia
Tourism in Cambodia—renowned for its magnificent Buddhist Khmer temples like Angkor—is deeply affected by the fighting along the Thai border. Many Vietnamese and other Asian tourists had planned cultural circuits combining treks, rice-field visits, and historical sites, which have now been interrupted by renewed violence.
The border region, shaped by monsoon rains and populated by Buddhist and Muslim minorities, is also a point of concern for possible radicalization risks and terrorism, adding to the overall instability.
Movement within this so-called Indochina region has been severely restricted, complicating procedures for visas and passport processing, and pushing tourists to rely on flight routes rather than land crossings.
🏯 Cultural & Historical Context: From Buddhism to Khmer Rouge Legacies
Cambodia still bears the scars of its tragic Khmer Rouge past. Today, Buddhism remains a powerful spiritual anchor, visible in the life of Khmer people through its pagodas and religious rituals.
The current conflict, affecting regions where Khmer, Vietnamese, and Lao communities cohabit, reignites old social wounds and underlines the urgent need for peace in this sensitive Southeast Asian peninsula.
The border violence also threatens cultural exchange, economic ties, and the religious fabric of the region, especially around key Buddhist cities.
✈️ Travel Precautions in Times of Crisis
For travelers planning to visit Cambodia or Thailand during this tense period, it's crucial to choose routes far from the southwestern border. Safe itineraries should include visits to Angkor temples, active pagodas, and treks in protected natural areas.
Ensure your passport is valid and your visa meets official requirements. Check embassy guidance regularly, and prioritize air travel into Phnom Penh or other major Thai cities to avoid the unstable border zones.
Phuket—a common international gateway and stepping stone for Asia cruises—remains usable for travelers, though excursions into contested border regions should be avoided until further notice.
📌 Summary of the Situation
Colonial-era border lines and temple sovereignty (especially Preah Vihear) are central to the conflict.
Since May–July 2025, increased violence has involved heavy artillery, air strikes, and a large number of displaced civilians.
The main conflict remains centered in Cambodia's north (Preah Vihear and Oddar Meanchey), opposite Thai provinces Surin and Sisaket.
The situation remains in flux, as the UN convenes emergency sessions and international leaders call for a ceasefire.
📌 Politics & Historical Context
Why are Thailand and Cambodia in conflict?
Territorial disputes have persisted for decades, primarily centered around the Preah Vihear temple. Tensions often flare during election periods or periods of political instability in either country.
What’s the connection with the Khmer Rouge and recent history?
Cambodia’s communist past under the Khmer Rouge left deep scars. Some border areas served as hideouts during the regime and remain sensitive zones even today, both politically and emotionally.
Does colonial history play a role in the dispute?
Yes. Many of the borders drawn during French colonial rule are at the root of long-standing conflicts in the Indochina peninsula, especially where cultural and ethnic boundaries don’t align with political ones.
🚧 Tension Zones Between Thailand and Cambodia
Which areas are affected by the conflict?
The main flashpoint is the Preah Vihear temple, a UNESCO World Heritage Site located right on the Cambodia–Thailand border. Although the International Court of Justice awarded it to Cambodia in 1962, both countries claim the surrounding area, fueling ongoing disputes.
Can these areas be visited by tourists?
It is strongly discouraged to approach the border in this region, particularly in the Cambodian provinces of Preah Vihear and Oddar Meanchey, and the Thai province of Sisaket. When in doubt, choose travel routes far from disputed zones.
Are there current risks for tourists?
No direct danger has been reported in major tourist destinations like Siem Reap, Phnom Penh, Bangkok, or Phuket. However, remote trails and off-the-beaten-path areas near the border should be strictly avoided.
Cambodia-Thailand Tensions in the Geopolitical Context of Southeast Asia
The border conflict between Cambodia and Thailand arises at a time when the ASEAN region and the Asia-Pacific face multiple geopolitical challenges. The Cambodian prime minister and his Thai counterpart are under pressure to control the situation, while countries across East Asia and Southeast Asia are closely watching the conflict’s developments.
At the heart of the region, the Indochina peninsula—once known as Kampuchea under communist rule—still bears the wounds of the past, especially the genocide committed by the Khmer Rouge and the horrors of the Killing Fields. These events deeply mark the collective consciousness, reflected in the spiritual devotion of Buddhist monks and the preservation of Khmer Empire heritage, notably at Angkor Wat.
This historical background weighs heavily on diplomatic relations today. Modern infrastructures, such as airports and visa-on-arrival services, demonstrate Cambodia’s desire to assert its place in global tourism despite ongoing border tensions. The US dollar (USD) and GMT time zones remain key references for foreigners, including travelers exploring circuits around the Mekong Delta, Tonle Sap lake, and the countryside villages.
Impact on Tourism and Travelers: Between Angkor Wat and Conflict Zones
Growing tensions between Cambodia and Thailand are severely disrupting travel in Southeast Asia. Thousands of foreigners coming to admire the iconic temple of Angkor Wat and visit Phnom Penh’s Royal Palace now worry about the risks linked to the proximity of conflict zones.
Adventure tourism, including trekking in rural areas and cruises on the Mekong River, as well as welcoming communities — notably Buddhist monks in pagodas — are significantly affected. Tourist buses avoid sensitive areas, and routes to places like Luang Prabang in Laos face disruptions, impacting classic Southeast Asian travel circuits.
The dry season may provide a more stable window for travel, but ongoing threats from sporadic bombings and military incidents remain serious safety concerns for visitors.
Historical Legacy and Living Memory: From the Khmer Empire to Modern Wars
The rivalry between Cambodia and Thailand is rooted in the legacy of the Khmer Empire, symbolized powerfully by Angkor Wat as a cultural and spiritual emblem. However, recent history also reminds us of the deep divisions caused by the Vietnam War, in which the region was a central battleground.
Cambodia endured the genocide of the 1970s, with the Killing Fields casting a tragic shadow over the country. These painful memories continue to shape both internal and external perceptions of the region, fueling a patriotic sentiment that sometimes heightens tensions with neighboring Thailand.
Today, the Cambodian monarchy — a symbol of national unity — works to ease tensions, while foreign travelers experience a blend of ancient history and current realities during their visits.
Strategic Stakes in the Region: The Role of the South China Sea and Airports in Southeast Asia
The Cambodia-Thailand tension is not isolated but part of broader dynamics in Southeast Asia and the Asia-Pacific region. The South China Sea, a hotspot for territorial disputes, adds complexity to the geopolitical landscape.
International airports in the region, gateways for tourism and trade, are strategic points for managing the flow of people, especially through visa-on-arrival programs that regulate foreign arrivals.
ASEAN cooperation aims to prevent wider regional destabilization, mindful of the millions of people whose livelihoods rely on the success of tourism—particularly in rural areas around Tonle Sap and the Mekong Delta.
Travel
Asia Blog – Practical tips about Vietnam, Thailand, South Korea, Cambodia... visas, eSIMs, banking, travel budget, and more.
© 2025. All rights reserved.
